As a leader, it can be challenging to create an environment in which people will freely disagree and argue, but as the saying goes: From confrontation comes brilliance.
There are the "counter-dependents", those who usually disagree with everything that is said, particularly if it comes from the chairman or through consensus from the group.
Survey respondents disagree over whether this generation will follow in their parents' footsteps, moving to the suburbs to raise families, or will choose to remain in the city center.
Would they not have to fall in line with the defense, that the defendants had acted under a power of compulsion that also extended to them, the witnesses?