正确英语怎么说
Macy's has a decent website and I have listed the right website address below so you can scroll down for it.
The question is not regarding the validity of speciation.
Recent research bears out the broad brushstrokes of their claim but reveals that women can be equally, if less dangerously, belligerent.
Some people were assuming you can affect happiness if, for example, you picked the right goals, but there was all this literature that suggested it was impossible, that what goes up must come down.
We had doubts about the validity of their argument.
Pragmatic equivalence in translation can be achieved on the premises of the understanding of language.
Funnily enough whenever I ask the question "but are those plans ever right?"
"Because the science and mathematics you know are not correct," he said.
Proper alignment of memory chunks is guaranteed.
Using PHP V4, you would have to test the argument types in this example to be absolutely sure that the coder passes around the right kind of objects.
The others, reassuringly, correctly diagnosed migraine.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with reminding a toddler to say "Please" and "Thanks".
This trait is very important in correctly differentiating checkered beetles from Melyridae.
For them, the right kind of gamification might be turning their sales pitches into a competition with other team members, complete with a digital leaderboard showing who is winning at all times.
FeedMyApp uses pagination in the right way: to display its vast list of apps in digestible chunks.
We printed the report in good faith but have now learnt that it was incorrect.
By studying about 700 adult smokers, she found out that her mom quit the right way—by stopping abruptly and completely.
Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value.
In the process, human beings still decide on the correct answers.
I have every confidence that this decision will be fully vindicated.
It's not just a fiction story, but tells us about the correct values.
I am not sure that this is sound democratic practice.
The recent discovery of a pterosaur specimen covered in long, dense, and relatively thick hairlike fossil material was the first clear evidence that his reasoning was correct.
It is equally true that, in studying the diverse wisdom of others, we learn how to think.
Many factors related to how the sample was collected could render your relative popularity inferences incorrect.